History -- 1998 to Present -- Music's Grand Spiral O' Death --

Webcasting - 2002

Please note that most dates on this page link to articles in the Boycott-RIAA news archives or other publications.
The date shown is when the article was posted and not necessarily the day the events described took place.

May 21 -- The Librarian of Congress has announced today that he is rejecting the proposed controversial rates by the CARP, giving hope to webcasters once more that their world will not be turned upside down on them.

June 21 -- The U.S. Copyright Office and the Librarian of Congress officially announced their decision on the ever-controversial royalty rates for webcasting music online. The official fees come in at a rate of .07 cents per song which is streamed live online and a lower rate of .02 cents per stream for simulcasted and / or archived broadcasts. There is also an additional fee to keep copies of the music on the web server of 8.8 percent of the entire royalty fee, which is tacked on top of the total cost of the royalty rates. :(

While the rates are half of that which CARP recommended initially, the finalized official fee structure still may force a vast majority of independent webcasters offline. With a additional requirement of payment of back royalties all the way through 1998, webcasters now have only 45 days to come up with the payment for webcasting already done, putting many in a unrealistic position of trying to come up with absurd amounts of money for a service which they may not have been charging for to begin with.

June 24 -- Mark Cuban (now owner of the Dallas Mavericks) speaks out on how the Broadcast.com deal with the RIAA was designed to to stifle competition. This deal was the only precedent for which the US Copyright Office CARP panel recommended the webcasting royalty rates now finalized by the Librarian of Congress, which are pushing independent webcasters off-line.

The voluntary royalty deal between Yahoo! and the RIAA that the Librarian of Congress announced as his template for the entire industry last week was a deal crafted by Yahoo! to shut out small webcasters and decrease competition, Broadcast.com founder and Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban revealed.

July 29 -- Artemis Records has agreed to issue licenses to internet radio for one year for the master use of songs by all Artemis recording artists. This announcement was made today by Danny Goldberg, Chairman and CEO, Artemis Records and Daniel Glass, President, Artemis Records. During this period, beginning August 1, 2002, Artemis will waive the royalty payments that would otherwise be due them.

Artemis Records is a New York-based independent record label with a roster that includes Kittie, singer/songwriter Steve Earle and rapper Khia, as well as the critically acclaimed Marah and Josh Joplin Group, Boston, Ricki Lee Jones, North Mississippi All Stars, and Graham Nash among others. They are the label for the Dark Angel Soundtrack, Steal this movie Soundtrack and others.

October 7 -- Last week a bill was introduced in the house to extend the deadline for small Webcasters by six months to start paying performance royalties. Then all of a sudden, with lobbying from both sides, they said that they could negotiate an agreement by the end of the week and on Sunday an agreement was reached. A press release was issued on HR 5469 saying that an agreement had been reached. Then all of a sudden we're hearing that the agreement was in trouble and may not get past the artists. What happened?

The agreement that the small webcasters accepted had the artists being paid directly their share of the performance royalty, but after the webcasters left, language was inserted that eliminated direct payments to artists, allowing the RIAA and SoundExchange to recoup their expenses before making any payment to artists.

Mitch Glazer added the language that made the bill unpalatable to the webcasters as well as the artists.

October 8 -- In an amazing turnaround, the House Judiciary Committee added the text back into the bill HR 5469 (Webcasting Royalty Bill) that sees to it that the artists get paid directly. The bill offers a lower royalty rate to small commerical webcasters. However the bill does not apply to college webcasters so there are still some issues to settle.

October 23 -- WASHINGTON-- In a scramble to end their session, senators have left small commercial Webcasters with an uncertain--and potentially expensive--future.

Online radio stations and the recording industry, including the RIAA, had agreed on royalty rates that would considerably discount what Webcasters are to pay music companies, but the rates required the approval of Congress. Both groups expected the Senate to approve the rates late Thursday night, but 20 minutes before the vote Senator Jesse Helms (R-North Carolina) put a hold on the bill at the request of small religious broadcasters in North Carolina.

"Our constituents did not have full opportunity to participate," says Joe Lanier, a Helms aide. He says Congress was moving too fast and overlooked the interests of these Webcasters.

The Librarian of Congress in June imposed a rate of.07 cents per song per listener. This rate--which now takes effect on Sunday--is retroactive to the date the Webcasters started business. Many Webcasters object that the rate is too high and will force them off the Internet.

At first, members of Congress drafted a bill to extend the royalty deadline by six months. That effort was abandoned on October 1 when small commercial Webcasters and the recording industry said they could reach an agreement. House Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin) gave them a week to strike a deal, and agreement was reached October 6. Sensenbrenner introduced a bill outlining the compromise, which creates a sliding fee scale based on revenue for the next two years. Sensenbrenner's bill passed by a voice vote in the House last week. The bill's sponsors, the recording industry, and several Webcasters expected the Senate to approve the bill by unanimous consent Thursday, three days before the Librarian of Congress's rates went into effect. Then Helms halted the process.

Deborah Proctor, general manager of WCPE, a public radio station in Wake Forest, North Carolina, also streams its classical music broadcasts over the Internet. She says her station wanted to be a part of the negotiations.

"Unless you had six digits to pay for the arbitration process, you couldn't even comment," Proctor says.

November 14 -- Las Vegas, NV (November 14, 2002) - As the lame duck legislative session begins today, the webcasting community continues the fight to keep HR 5469 from passing in the Senate and becoming law.

A year that started with the webcasting industry united in a common goal to work on the CARP (Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel) rates and develop reasonable, equitable legislation as an industry standard has ended with the entire U.S.-based webcasting community up in arms over a private deal negotiated between the RIAA and VOW (Voice of Webcasters).

"There is nothing wrong with a group of individual webcasters sitting down at the table to negotiate a deal with the RIAA," said Ann Gabriel, President of Webcaster Alliance and CEO of Las Vegas-based Gabriel Media Inc. "When a private negotiation ends up being written into language for a Bill and then forced as a yoke around the neck of an entire industry which had no say in the matter, there is something terribly wrong with our legislative process."

The webcasting industry at large watched in horror as an amended HR 5469 was passed through the House in early October. When initially introduced in late September by Congressman James Sensenbrenner, the one-paragraph Bill called for a 6-month stay in the imposed royalty rates collection on music broadcast over the Internet. The original version of 5469 was circulated, widely accepted and approved by both webcasters and the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), which represents terrestrial Radio stations.

But before HR 5469 could be introduced on the House floor, the RIAA yelled foul, brought in the AFL-CIO to scuttle it and Sensenbrenner pulled it from the "rules suspension" session. Sensenbrenner then demanded the RIAA and VOW negotiate a deal. That privately negotiated deal then became the language of a new HR 5469, which ballooned into a 30-plus page piece of legislation considered by most in the webcasting industry to be a legal nightmare.

Sources

  • Whenever possible, all articles on this page are linked to the source. The chronology of the articles was culled from extensive research in the Boycott-RIAA News Archives.