ASCAP Joins RIAA Anti-Consumer Stance

By George Ziemann

March 22, 2003 -- Received a letter from ASCAP today, which begins as follows:

March 20, 2003

I am writing to ask your help on an issue that affects us all - the need for protecting the rights of songwriters, composers, and music publishers in Congress.

We are all more than aware, in the current climate of technological innovation, that while many more vehicles for the dissemination of our music have emerged, this is dramatically offset by a very powerful majority that sees nothing wrong with using our music without paying for it.

Changing this mindset is certainly a formidable challenge that we must continue to aggressively address in the days to come. We will be meeting with our legislators, generating letters and phone calls, and we will be contacting you to assist us in this critical effort...

Marilyn Bergman

 

I urge all other ASCAP members to LET ASCAP AND YOUR SENATORS KNOW if you disagree with ASCAP's representation of you in this matter. This is how I responded to ASCAP's request. Feel free to use it as necessary.


Marilyn Bergman
ASCAP
One Lincoln Plaza
New York, NY 10023

March 22, 2003

Dear Marilyn,

I am appalled to discover that ASCAP has taken the position of characterizing the audience we are trying to reach as "a very powerful majority that sees nothing wrong with using our music without paying for it."

I would like to remind that until this "climate of technological innovation" arrived, our greatest vehicle for promotion and distribution had been radio.

Has not radio led the consumer to believe that music was free to listen to? Have the labels not been paying "independent promoters" to get their music played on the radio, as Don Henley recently asserted in front of the Senate Commerce Committee (Jan 30, 2003)?

Why are we now supposed to view our fans, who are actively promoting us by spreading inferior promotional versions (mp3s) of our music, as criminals trying to steal from us?

Are not the greatest costs to the recording industry those of marketing, promotion and distribution? Everyone keeps telling me so as the basis for not paying a more reasonable artist royalty.

The mp3 file has offered the industry a virtually free promotion and marketing tool. You have chosen to demonize it, criminalize it and are now blaming the consumer for the industry's problems because they listened to these promotional samples and have the audacity to think that they shouldn't pay to listen to our advertisements for ourselves.

If the intent of ASCAP is to join the RIAA in its persecution of the consumer for the benefit of the major labels, you do not represent the interests of myself or the other 97 percent of the recording artists in the country that are not signed to the major labels. According to the Recording Artists Coalition, you might not represent them, either.

Having just recently had my ASCAP publisher application accepted, I was anxious to get my growing catalog listed. However, I am suddenly hesitant to register my songs or those of others with ASCAP. File-sharing and mp3 files have enabled me to reach a global audience for $20 a month. Until this point in time, my greatest obstacle has been how to get people to search for my music, as opposed to that of the major labels.

On the other hand, you could be interpreted as being the independent artists' greatest ally. For every act signed to a major label, there are 100 indie acts which are not. Please take the RIAA music off the peer-to-peer networks so that people will stop looking for them and find our songs.

The rest of us do not want our fans to be punished for advertising us. They are our "independent promotors" that the labels apparently pay so much for. Ours work for free. They wear our t-shirts and give away free samples.

If you want to punish them for providing this free service, I don't want my songs used as evidence.